Being Good

This book by Simon Blackburn (author of Think) is, as was his other book, a general introduction to some key philosophical issues and themes; it's also one that I had already read before I started this blog but I'm re-reading it now to see whether it's worth giving to my youngest brother who has just started studying philosophy for his A-levels.

   Anyway - Blackburn, in three large chunks, covers:

• Threats to ethics
• The death of God
• Egoism
• Evolutionary theory
• Determinism & futility
• Unreasonable demands
• False consciousness
• Some ethical ideas
• Birth
• Death
• Desire & the meaning of life
• Pleasure
• The greatest happiness of the greatest number
• Freedom from the bad
• Freedom & paternalism
• Rights & natural rights
• Foundations of ethics
• Reasons & foundations
• Being good & living well
• The categorical imperative
• Contracts & discourse
• The common point of view
• Confidence restored

   And that's the book.

   Though I have a lot of nits to pick with Blackburn in the minutiae, every philosopher has to come to their own conclusions, and he does to be fair present the things he discusses with a certain detachedness that enables the reader to continue their own explorations without being too bogged down with any of the biases found in what may well be their introductory text. A good book to kick off a habit of thinking about ethics with.

Think

This book by Simon Blackburn is a general, broad, accessible introduction of some of the key areas in philosophy. I had read it before, but shortly before I started my undergraduate in philosophy and therefore before I started this blog - but decided to re-read it because my youngest brother is currently studying philosophy for his A-levels and I want to give it him for his birthday but also make sure that it was an appropriate text for his level.

   Blackburn writes well, as eruditely as accessibly - he never introduces jargon terms without pre-empting them in common sense language, he never presumes that his readers are familiar with any particular thinkers or concepts, etc. Anyway, throughout the bitesize-enough-but-still-meaty eight chapters of the book he deals with: knowledge, mind, free will, the self, God, reasoning, the world, and 'what to do'. Across the brief sketches of philosophical history he outlines in these chapters he does manage to convey a largely helpful picture of some of the key themes that philosophers have been wrestling with for millennia, as well as diving somewhat deeper into particular thinkers who seem to shed further insight (though if you ask me, Blackburn has a bit too much of a hard-on for Hume).

   I'm confident that this book will be helpful to my brother - and in saying such, I'm saying I would probably recommend it as an introductory text for anyone of the age of fifteen or up starting to study philosophy from scratch. One small gripe I have is that this book barely deals with ethics, that being only around half of the final chapter - but Blackburn has written a whole other book similar to this one on that topic, my copy of which I am also re-reading to see if it's worth gifting to my brother, so watch this space.

Silence: a Christian History

This book by Diarmaid MacCulloch is precisely what it says on the tin - a history of Christianity focused on silence, about which there is far more to say than you would likely expect. I certainly found myself astounded at the breadth of things he was able to talk about and still felt that there were many places in which he was being deliberately brief as there was yet more to say left on the cutting-room floor.

   The text is split into four parts. Firstly, we get an overview of the pre-Christian influences on its attitude to silence, chiefly from Israel's Tanakh but also considering the impact of Platonic philosophy; followed by what we can glean from the New Testament (interestingly Jesus variably embraces and ends silence) about silence in the emergent Church's earliest years. Next, we span the first millennium of Christian history and how silence played different roles from the desert hermit to the marginalised gnostics to the nascent centralised episcopacy - these chapters go into considerable detail about silence as a practice among monks, and illuminated me as to the nuances between meditation and contemplation. Thirdly we look at three great upheavals across the second millennium of Church history - iconoclasm in Orthodoxy, the Gregorian reforms of Catholicism, and the Protestant Reformation* - and how these affected attitudes towards and practice of silence. The final section of the book attempts to reach behind the noise of Christian history - conceptualising silence as lacunae, things ignored, not talked about, rather than as a literal [in]audible phenomenon - here we take a close look at: Nicodemism (i.e. what happens when someone conceals their true character or beliefs to avoid social consequences; alongside historical examples there is a much more contemporary discussion of gay Anglo-Catholics); issues that the Church seems to be trying to forget out of historical shame (slavery, clerical child abuse, and the centuries of anti-Semitism which enabled the Holocaust are the main focuses); and the status of silence in present and future Christianities (music and ecumenism get special attention in this section, as does the complicated question of whistle-blowing - can we justifiably stay silent when truth demands we speak?).

   I'm really glad I read this book - it has given me a much richer understanding of the global historical precedents that surround the practices of worship to which, as a Quaker, I subscribe. MacCulloch is evidently a scholar of great thoroughness in diverse learning and erudite insight - though I will admit that this is the first non-fiction book with endnotes for a while for which I didn't read the endnotes. Nothing personal, Diarmaid, I just thought I was getting enough mental nourishment from your primary pages. Niche it may be as a topic, but if somehow you also find yourself curious about Christianity's historical relationship with silence, this is almost certainly THE book to go to.

* It is in this chapter that we get the chief discussion of Quakers, which was the whole reason I bought this book to begin with - I do think MacCulloch could and should have gone into greater depth when considering a denomination for whom silence is part and parcel of their worship style, but then look at how much other ground he's had to cover. And besides, it's hardly as if there's a dearth of Quaker literature to engage with for that kind of insight.

the Courage to Be

This book by Paul Tillich is what I wanted Kierkegaard's The Concept of Anxiety to be - a philosophically coherent and spiritually compelling discussion of anxiety, fear, and existential dread, as these are psychologically dissolved in the ontological freedom of faith which gives us "the courage to be".

   Tillich is always an interesting theologian to read in large part because he starts off seeming to not be doing theology at all. The first five chapters of this book are all grounded in philosophy and psychology, and only in the final chapter does he tie everything together into points immediately apparently relevant to the religious life of a believer. The first chapter is a rough introduction to the concept of courage in relation to being, walking briskly through Plato to Aquinas, the Stoics, Spinoza and Nietzsche; the second constructs a conceptual framework for anxiety through the interrelation of being and non-being (alongside this ontology he also sketches the three main types of anxiety natural to humankind - that is death, meaninglessness, and condemnation); and the third briefly deals with pathological anxiety and the circumstances that cause it to arise - also making a rough delineation between what needs treating pastorally and what medically. Chapters four and five then take the plunge into applying these foundations to two different manifestations of the courage to be: firstly the courage to be as a part of a larger whole, having a confident identity as a member of a collective (with a deeper inspection of conformist tendencies in Western democratic societies); then the courage to be oneself as the unique individual one is - unsurprisingly reflected to a great degree in the cultural and intellectual developments of existentialism. The final chapter then offers a third model of the courage to be, one which absorbs and transcends the previous two - this is a model only attainable by faith in the grace of God: when humankind encounters the divine and knows it is accepted by it, we are presented with a heavenly acceptance of who we are, and by accepting this acceptance we can start to grow in a confidence of our individual and collective identities, which as they develop give us an ever deeper penetration into the relationship with God that makes such courage to be possible.

   This was a very insightful read. Tillich's breadth of applicable understanding in both philosophy and psychology make for some very unexpected avenues of thought that nevertheless find their fruition in the conclusions. I'd highly recommend this book to readers of any faith who want to dive deeper into the means of avoiding despair at the human condition.

the Foolishness of God

This book by John Austin Baker is a masterwork of apophatic theology - that is to say, a coherent & cogent apologetic for Christian truth managing to make the points it does without drawing on or developing dogma or doctrine to whatever degree. Instead of engaging theological conversation in the conventional sense, Baker develops his case through a wildly minimalistic series of common-sense considerations - he assumes nothing about doctrinal truth or falsity, seeming to make his position as difficult as possible, yet in my opinion still resoundingly succeeds in making a compelling picture of Christian truth.

   The text is split into three parts. Firstly, we consider what the universal human experience can, or cannot, imply to us about the nature of life in all its wondrous mess, and further about the nature of all that is - including God, if God exists. These chapters blend anthropological history with moral psychology to construct a nest of arguments toward the Being of an omnipotent benevolent personality. Next we take a close look at Jesus, given that Christianity claims him to be both God and God's definitive revelation: again, there is no traditional Christology involved here, but a rigorous appraisal of the historical figure of Jesus insofar as such a portrait can be properly reconstructed from the evidential documents, and finally a reflection on how even a minimalistic interpretation of the character & ministry of the historical Christ aligns him to profound depths with what we can say to be true of the God as developed in the prior chapters. The final chapters of the book skip into the present to discuss how human experience of & engagement with the Church & the Bible do [or don't] affirm everything already argued, before ending on more of a hypothetical provocation to the reader - that is, if we as the simple sinful humans we are experience living in God's presence & under God's truth & find that doing such challenges & changes us, obviously there remains questions & missions to pursue that mere doctrine cannot speak to satisfactorily.

   I really enjoyed this book. It's a bit academic in tone, if not in content technically, but ultimately very readable with a bit of patience for the way Baker's arguments skip back & forth while different strands of them are being developed. This ranks highly among the books I would give someone to try to persuadingly nudge them toward Christian faith; more substantial than mere vibes but less parochial than most mainstream efforts in apologetics. Recommended reading for Christians looking to develop more of a muscular & less of a Totally-Sure-Of-Myself style of evangelical argument - and, lest it not be said, potentially a book that could knock some coconuts off the shy of a non-believer's grasp of their own oh-so-precious common sense.

Terry Pratchett: A Life with Footnotes

This book, composed by Rob Wilkins based on autobiographical notes made by the subject, Terry Pratchett, is a brilliant biography. I won't say too much about his life or character as portrayed herein as in an early (post-wise) recommendation I think everyone should read this book - it's a heartfelt and complicated and beautiful image of the man who probably has done the most anyone has done for fantasy fiction since Tolkien, and I do not say that lightly.

    Wilkins's prose is passable enough but it's the pictures carried therein that really move this book to something brilliant - one really gets to know Pratchett in an intimate sense, from his childhood as an under-achiever to his unwanted death to dementia.* Some of the earlier chapters are genuinely idyllic - his lifestyle throughout the 1970's read to me like some kind of fantasy it was so much so. One also gets a thorough picture of the blue-collar attitude he took to the business of writing novels - perhaps most perfectly displayed in the discussion of when Pratchett took six months of sabbatical to rest his mind, and then following this when Wilkins (as was at the time his personal assistant) asked him what he did with his time off, Terry grumpily replied "I wrote two books." Further from this though is an image of a man with an insatiable aptitude for practical learning - even though he'd never done particularly well at school, Terry would take an interest in something and learn the skills to master it. From his room full of old hardware that he never dared throw away in case it might still prove useful to the brilliant story of how when he recieved a knighthood he bought a small knob of metal from a meteor, found a local blacksmith and learned himself how to smith metal, personally mined a bunch of iron, forged a sword using this iron and the meteor-metal he'd obtained, and got knighted using exactly that sword.** Basically the man was a living legend, full of so much humour and wisdom that I sincerely believe the Discworld series will survive for centuries to come.

    As already said, I would recommend this book to anyone. It's a lovely read. But if you are already a fan of Pratchett's work, or at all interested in the kind of character who could produce such diverse and prolific literature - this is a must-do.

* I will say that this book, especially in the latter chapters dealing with Pratchett's struggle with early-onset Alzheimer's, is a hardcore manifesto for the right to self-dying. The tragedy of everything that you are, that you know yourself to be, degrading as your body decays, is an abhorrence, and though before reading this I had qualms about it, since, I am fully on Terry's side and think that one should be able to of sound mind & heart choose the time & method of their exit from this world should they, their family, and their medical authorities foresee nothing left for them but loss and pain. After all, if there's one thing Terry taught us overall, it's that Death is a friendly dude just doing his job.

** Tangential I know, but as a D&D dungeon master I've always had it in my head that were I to plan a campaign set in a magical post-apocalyptic England, then 'Terry Pratchett's Meteor Sword' would have to be a legendary item. I haven't worked out its stats yet.

Walking on Water

This book by novelist Madeleine l'Engle is a prolonged collection of reflections on the relationship between the creative & spiritual as experienced by the Christian artist. It utterly eschews scholarly support or argument, instead drawing on personal experience, which makes for a personable, compelling read rooted in real-world struggles of nuance. Highly recommended reading for Christians engaged in the arts to any degree; it will refresh, edify & inspire.

Union with Christ

This book is a collection of essays by the Puritan thinker Thomas Boston, on a theme which the title probably makes clear enough. I've been reading this through with my dad and have found the experience soundly edifying and an effective mode of discipleship, intellectually and spiritually. Boston's prose, though old, is not archaic, and thus relatively easy to read and interpret. The points he makes are very gospel-grounded; I don't think anything in this book would be at all controversial to most orthodox Christians, and I do think that much of what is in here would be of great help to those same in the deepening of their conviction as regards their union with Christ, as is the gist of the New Testament.

Signs of the Spirit

This book is an interpretation by Sam Storms of Jonathan Edwards's Religious Affections - part paraphrase, part summary, part commentary, in view of making the old Puritan's immensely dense & hard-to-read ideas in their original text more accessible to the modern layperson. Edwards easily ranks among the most important American theologians in history but he is notoriously difficult, obtuse even, in his writing style, so a book like this that attempts to communicate his arguments in shorter clearer sentences is of much value. The Religious Affections as a text is concerned with establishing biblically and doctrinally sound principles by which we may discern whether the spiritual experiences and outputs of a person's life can be known to be genuinely imparted by the Holy Spirit and thus attest to the authenticity of that person's faith.

   Storms (or perhaps Edwards, I have no means of telling what the original text's chapter division scheme is like) opens with a brief introduction on the nature of true spirituality - that is, a life of faith characterised by love for and joy in Jesus Christ - and that such a life will manifest spiritual affections, experiences of mind & heart that lift one into cognizant fellowship with the divine. He then establishes the biblical foundations for this concept, and briefly discusses its utility in prayer, praise & preaching. Then we get to the list of twenty-four affections at the core of the book: the first twelve are "signs of nothing", i.e. spiritual or psychological or emotional experiences that, however much they may feel or appear to be religious at face value, are actually inconclusive in determining whether they are genuine signs of saving faith; the subsequent twelve however are, according to Edwards, sure signifiers that the person experiencing the affection is numbered among God's children. Thus:

1. Affections that are truly spiritual and gracious arise from influences and operations on the heart that are supernatural and divine.
2. The first objective ground of gracious affections is the transcendently excellent and amiable nature of divine things as they are in themselves, and not in any conceived relation to self-interest.
3. Those affections that are truly holy are primarily founded on the loveliness of the moral excellence of divine things.
4. Gracious affections arise from the mind being enlightened rightly and spiritually to understand or apprehend divine things.
5. Truly gracious affections are attended with a reasonable and spiritual conviction of the judgement, reality and certainty of divine things.
6. Gracious affections are attended with evangelical humiliation [that is, authentic humility in Christ's service].
7. Gracious affections are distinguished from those that are false in that they are accompanied by a change of nature.
8. True religious affections reflect the character of Christ; they produce and promote the same love, humility, forgiveness & mercy that we see in him.
9. Authentic affections soften the heart and produce a tenderness of spirit and sensitivity toward sin.
10. Godly & gracious affections differ from those that are false in their beautiful symmetry and proportion.
11. When genuine gracious affections are experienced in high degree, it serves to intensify one's longing for more.
12. Gracious affections always bear the fruit of holiness of life.

   I haven't read nor have any plan to read Edwards's original work, so I can't say to what degree the unpacking of each of these does justice to the spiritual depth or intellectual integrity of the arguments presented in simplified summary, but Storms certainly doesn't come across as being less thorough than he should be.

   Alongside the interpretation of the Religious Affections, this book includes a second part - again part paraphrase, part summary, part commentary (and part lengthy direct quote) of another work by Edwards, his testimony as originally told in a short autobiographical text called the Personal Narrative; I found this part of the book extremely edifying and challenging as a subjective story of coming into and growing in relationship with God - it deals in considerable depth the religious affections of Edwards himself (chiefly sorrow at the vileness of his own sin & sweet joy at the beauty of God's holiness) as he walked his spiritual path, and thus complements the main bulk of this book perfectly in a less abstract, more applicable manner.

   Ultimately though I don't think this is a book I would recommend much. Its subject matter is theologically, spiritually and psychologically interesting, but as things stand we as humans can never attain a God's-eye-view of the true heart of another, and with experiences and expressions of affection in word and deed being often distorted by the muddy mixture of sin and liberation from it in the hearts of even true believers, it is impossible for us as creatures to perfectly discern the spiritual health of anyone, including ourselves. Such judgement is ineffable, God's alone, and only He knows the full roster of his elect. So though Edwards's system for ascertaining whether one's faith is authentic is coherent and hard to find much to argue with in terms of its orthodox grounding, it isn't particularly practical for either individual or corporate spiritual instruction. "You shall know them by their fruits," says Jesus, but again sinners may by common grace produce good fruit and the redeemed may still harbour fleshly inclinations, so any hope of us being able to properly categorise people as elected for salvation or not evaporates on contact with a creation that still groans in its wait for renewal.

Accidental Saints

This book by Denver's most famous Lutheran pastor, Nadia Bolz-Weber, is a collection of searingly honest autobiographical vignettes of the complexities and difficulties of the real rough Christian life as experienced through her pastoral career. People are broken and messy - they will disappoint you, confuse you, sin against you, requiring love and forgiveness in amounts that do not come naturally to humans outside the activity of the Holy Spirit. In this book Nadia skips through a series of problematic encounters that she's had, wrestling with God over how best to encourage or rebuke others as much as wrestling with God over how much we might need an encouragement or a rebuke that we're unwilling to currently hear. She writes with shockingly frank vulnerability, and a down-to-earth lucidity that is extremely readable, and her way of discussing both practical and spiritual matters is so deft that one easily gets a sense of the shapes of situations discussed. It is a book that makes you deeply grateful for God's grace, as it reminds us just how much all of us need it. Reminding me somewhat of Dave Tomlinson's How to be a Bad Christian, though with more emphasis on pastoral care than on individual behaviours and attitudes. I'd recommend this a solid resource for any Christians feeling somewhat stultified in their faith and relationships, as it makes a powerful wake-up call to the boundary-pushing certainty-defying modus operandi of our God's grace.

the Reason for God

This book by Tim Keller is a reasonably accessibly-written but thoroughly intellectually-robust apologetic for the Christian faith. I recently read Francis Spufford's marvellous effort at proposing an entirely irrational apologetic, so I thought I'd balance it out with something that appeals more to the head than the gut - and this did not disappoint. I have read this book before, the summer before I started this blog, so retained a sense of its general gist, but it was truly a pleasure to revisit the concrete arguments.

   Keller splits the book into two sections of seven chapters each.* After a brief introduction exploring the helpfulness and limits of doubt in our contemporary skeptical culture, the first half digs into some of the biggest obstacles in the way of people coming into meaningful contact with the Christian faith, and for each shows how all of these hurdles are actually based on unprovable "faith" assumptions in themselves. These issues are:

1. the problem of Christianity's exclusivity when there are so many other competing religions
2. the problem of suffering, which exists despite God being supposedly purely good & all-powerful
3. the restrictive limitations following Christianity places upon a human life
4. the historical injustices & present hypocrisies of the Church
5. the thorny issue of Hell - surely a good God wouldn't be so extreme as to condemn people to an eternity of suffering?
6. the challenge supposedly posed by science, which many consider to have disproved religion for good
7. the logical and ethical snafus entailed in taking the Bible literally
   
   Having dealt with some of the strongest and commonest arguments against Christianity, we then have a short intermission chapter which considers the subjective nature of rationality itself. Then we head into the second set of seven chapters, which pose some of the strongest reasons for Christian belief.
   
   
8. the orderliness (and indeed existence) of the universe & meaningfulness
9. the innate sense of moral standards that seems essentially universal to humankind
10. the existential hole that sin leaves in the human heart, which we try to fill with idols but can only be satisfied by God
11. the radically distinctive nature of the Christian gospel as compared to other religions
12. the rationally revolting but emotionally intuitive core of Christianity - the incarnate God crucified for our sake
13. the resurrection of Jesus & the explosive emergence of the early Church being the simplest & best historical explanations for each other
14. God's Trinitarian nature providing a cogent & appealing explanation for the natures of creation & humankind

   Having dismantled some of the strongest arguments against and illumined some of the clearest arguments for Christianity, the concluding chapter is a gentle but confident prod for the reader of what to do if they feel themselves approaching a faith that they can truly call their own. After the philosophical and theological weight of the chief portion of the book this provides a comforting pastoral cool-down, though for non-Christian readers this may well be the most challenging part of the whole text.

   Overall I think this is a great book for making the case for Christianity in as best reasoned a way as possible. Keller never lands on absolute proof, but his earlier chapters show that nor do critiques of faith; and his points throughout cohere to short-circuit "absolute rationality" into a more pragmatic reasonability to which I think Christian belief is well-suited. A highly recommended book for Christians who want to supplement their own skillset in arguing for the Kingdom, and moreso a must-read for those whose curiosity about Christian faith is drowned out by overwhelming presumption that the case against it is too strong.

* Summarising the arguments Keller makes in each of these chapters is beyond the scope of this post, so you'll just have to take my word for it that his treatment of all matters discussed is intellectually humble but compellingly-put. And hey, I am a completely fallible blogger so if you don't want to take my word for it, you'll have to read the book and decide for yourself.

Unapologetic

This book by Francis Spufford is, despite his claims that it isn't an apologetic as it makes zero effort to engage with classic philosophical arguments for or against any particular theological claims, by far and away the best Christian apologetic I've ever read. I've literally just read the whole book in a single sitting* it's that good. The subtitle proclaims it as an exploration of "why, despite everything, Christianity can still make surprising emotional sense" - and to say it achieves the goal of making a case for this with aplomb would be a grand disservice to the word aplomb. It runs its course over eight perfectly-structured chapters:

1. a general introduction; statement of intent for the book
2. the existential experience of sin, or as he translates it the Human Propensity to Fuck Things Up
3. the frustrating ineffability of God in light of people's recurrent sense of needing, if not Him, then something to fill that gap
4. the confounding problem of suffering
5. the personality, teachings, mission and passion of one Yeshua from Nazareth
6. the historically improbable paradoxes surrounding the emergence of Christianity as a coherent religion
7. the complicated legacy and situational state of the Church
8. the subjective feeling entailed in having faith that one is forgiven, and the challenges and opportunity implied herein

   It's deeply insightfully clever without being scholarly**, bewilderingly matter-of-fact in what it says and completely down-to-earth in how it says it, balancing common-sense public presumption with personal but universally recognisable experiences and dazzlingly original points that lead him into compelling conclusions without ever making anything that so much as looks like a rational argument. Spufford not only doesn't avoid the prickly areas of conversation around Christianity in its contemporary context but actively leans into them and tries to give them as much benefit of the doubt as possible, and somehow still manages to wrangle cogent and meaningful ways of sidestepping or outright neutering them. He writes with a disarming simplicity and a refreshing honesty that if such style was wider emulated by Christian authors (and indeed everyday evangelising believers) I hazard to expect that we would see a great many more folks showing interest in the faith.

   Overall, this is a more-or-less perfect example of communicating Christianity effectively in a postmodern culture. If we are presumed by the world around us to be irrational, then give up on trying to convince people by reason - and talk about what it feels like to have one's messy spiritual life wrapped up in what never has been and never will be scientifically verifiable but is indisputably salient in its psychological cohesion to those who try to believe it. If you're a Christian, read this and be inspired to draw on your own emotional experience to communicate your own faith more fluidly, with less intellectual trumps and more confounding expressivity. If you're not a Christian - this book won't convince you to become one, but it may very well provoke you to give it a bloody good consideration.

* With minor breaks only to piss, smoke, and make more coffee.

** Spufford humbly boasts in a note at the end of the book that aside from checking to ensure the accuracy of certain factual claims and quotations used, he conducted exactly no research whatsoever throughout his writing process.

George Herbert - the Complete Works

This book is, as you probably inferred from the title, a complete collection of the works of the 17th-century poet George Herbert. I've been reading this very slowly for the past four years, having been gifted it by my second-eldest brother when he was very concerned about me (as I was having a psychotic episode at the time) and thought some archaic Christian poetry would break through to me, which it *kind of* did - I heavily annotated the first thirty or so pages of it in purple biro, emerged from the psychotic episode (after about a week) and then finished reading it bit by gratitude-debt bit in the time since then. It's a hard book to binge, being 17th-century poetry and so rather archaic and (sorry Josiah) stuffy in tone while also being deeply overtly deliberatively Christian in content, theme and message, which makes every poem, no matter how artful (and they are artful - the majority of the poems in this book are as technically well-constructed as their theology is orthodox-Anglican), feel somewhat like you're being sermonised at.

   The poetry is all lumped together in one big collection called The Church, with poems (mostly rather short, and often sonnets, which seem to be a particular specialty of Herbert's) unsurprisingly centring thematically around classic weighty Christian concepts, such as consciousness of one's own sin, prayer, confession, hope, grace, forgiveness, love, joy, peace, etc. This bulk of the book is prologued by a longer poem called The Church Porch which is much meatier in terms of a challenging mental/spiritual engagement as it explores the inner dynamics of a person weighing themselves up before entering a church (in both a day-to-day instance and in the lifelong sense), and epilogued by another longer poem called The Church Militant which is a triumphal hearty toot on the eschatological trumpet of what God's people look like from an eternal perspective.

   Alongside the poetry which forms the core backbone of the collected works, there is a 37 chapter prose piece called The Country Parson which is half essay, half sermon, half manual on how to be an effective parish priest (I will freely admit I somewhat skimmed this - it has a good deal of wisdom in it but nothing particularly groundbreaking), and a compiled list of 1,024 "Outlandish Proverbs", which initially I was rather excited by as I assumed George had come up with them all himself - however it seems more that he simply collected folksy wisdom from all over the place and put it all together in one big wodge (some of which is retained in proverb and idiom to this day, some of which is mere tautology or common-sensical to the point of banality, and some of which is downright impenetrable). Finally there is a small array of letters, lectures, translations, and his will, none of which I bothered to read at all.

   Christian readers who enjoy neatly-constructed if somewhat repetitive and decidedly unadventurous poetry will find a lot of edifying stuff in this book. Non-Christian poetry enjoyers will probably find it coming on far too strong a moralising and proselytising voice to read past. And non-Christian non-poetry enjoyers probably have no reason whatsoever to engage with the works of George Herbert unless it's part of your current academic syllabus to whatever extent. All that said, receiving this book four years ago was a significant moment in helping me claw me way back to sanity, so I will forever owe it that at least.

What Would Jesus Post?

This book by David Robertson takes that classic wristband acronym WWJD* and transplants it into the chaotic modern context of social media - hence the title. It's a good question. Were history's most famous Nazarene to have accounts on one of those half-dozen websites that constitute today's internet, what kind of content would he be putting out? Would he be a TikTok influencer? Instagram inspirer? YouTube video essayist? Twitter rage-debater? Reddit helper-outer of strangers lost in Google searches? Verbose blogger? Tumblr sharer of unprompted unhinged angles on stuff? Facebook shitposter? Some combination of any or all of the above? We simply don't know.**

   That doesn't mean we can't take the lessons learned from him and try our best to apply them to the communications landscape in which we find ourselves today, and I think Robertson has done a pretty solid job in this book of applying 2000ish-year-old meta-ethical precepts to Very New Paradigms of Possibility. It's far from a comprehensive*** manual, but as a starting point offers some healthy and biblical broad principles we can bear in mind as we engage with online communities as Christians. I think this is a very helpful and well thought-out book, and I would highly recommend it as a resource - most especially for older generations who have immigrated to the internet after an analogue life, and so aren't as adept as The Youth at navigating the psychosocial turbulence that all online society entails.

   Before concluding this post, I will give a special mention to the format of the chapters in this book, as they're all broken down into the same sections that help lend flow and intentionality to the reading process. We open with an introductory overview of "the way it is", before digging deeper into some relevant theological concepts, then having a "pause for thought" in which what's just been discussed is thrown over to us to particularly consider, after which in a "joining the dots" section we consider contextual or social elements that apply what we've just read to the realities of contemporary internet use, then "a way forward" points us toward particular behaviours or attitudes that help us maintain Christian consistency on these issues, a Bible verse or two with an explanation of how it helps us navigate this, "wisdom from the Psalms" as far as I can tell being simply a nice balm to the soul to concentrate on the spiritual side of life rather than being prompted to relate everything back to the online, and finally a few questions to prompt further thought. The length and order of these sections varies chapter to chapter but overall they are consistent throughout the book and make it a much more engaging discipleship experience as a reader.

* "What Would Jesus Do?" for you heathens unfamiliar.

** My money's split between Facebook shitposting and completely out-of-left-field Tumblr dumps, both of which would be essentially parables converted to fit the format. If ministry responsibilities left him with enough free time he'd probably have a YouTube channel with over 10,000,000 views but only 372 subscribers, on which the Tumblr parables are delivered vocally (as you'd expect, the comments sections are full of confusion, people who only watched the first ten seconds, and a minority of people saying "this changed my life"). He'd probably have Twitter, but unless he had something that absolutely HAD to be said there and then, he'd only use it for ironically retweeting Pharisees and Roman officials. If anyone in Jesus's orbit has a blog it's probably Matthew, and Peter and John would have competing Instagram and TikTok accounts documenting the day-to-day doings of the disciples.

*** There are chapters on: the internet as a public arena, prayer, porn, confession, sowing seeds, our digital tongue, dwelling in God's presence, wisdom and discernment, humility, hospitality and generosity, the Sabbath, spiritual gifts, spiritual fruit, gossip, persecution, the footprints we leave, and community. For a pretty short book it covers a lot of ground, but with Christianity and the internet both being as diversely complexly themselves as they are, one can easily imagine entire books being written about any of these chapters. Which is what I mean when I say this is more of an introductory provocation text.

Just Living

This book by Ruth Valerio is a brilliant resource for furnishing a Christianity-shaped thought train about social, economic and environmental justice. Its ideas are presented with ample but not suffocating explanation, and plenty of pragmatic but not exhaustive pointers for further consideration or praxis.

   The first third of the book explores the fields of the issues at hand; the nature and complexities of both globalisation and consumerism, and then the specific economic-cultural context the modern Church finds itself in when relating to these - hegemonic as they are.

   The middle third is the meaty theory section, where we really dig into theological and philosophical groundings for the origin and trajectory of applicable ethics: Valerio first looks at how simply neglecting the Church's relationship to socioeconomic justice leads to a Christianity that is merely therapeutic and basically capitulates to consumer capitalism; next we consider how the Church should relate to money and property, with a look at the ascetic monastic traditions (with St Benedict and St Francis especially focused on); then finally how Aristotle conceived and Thomas Aquinas developed notions of the interrelation of justice and temperance as virtues, and how these uphold human flourishing when rightly understood and practiced.

   The final third of the book is given over to practical exhortation - prompting the reader to think of what they can do to put these ideas into practice, and making the case for doing so. This includes: reorienting our perspectives to be more cognizant of socioeconomic and environmental injustice; aligning our attitudes toward money and material goods to Biblical ethics, and following on from that seeking to consume as ethically as we plausibly can; engaging fruitfully with our local communities; stepping into activism to provoke change in unsustainable & unjust structures; and lastly making prayerful & fruitful use of the time that is given to us.

   I have to say, as someone who has already put a great deal of thought into the nature & necessity of Christian work for ethical, justice-oriented living, I didn't personally learn a lot from this book. However I did find it edifying & encouraging, and it helped strengthen & deepen my understanding of the shared space my faith & my social/political inclinations occupy. Valerio's credentials as a theologian are just as valid as her credentials as an activist and from reading this book you will be left with an indelible sense of engaging with the wisdom & insight of someone who really does their best to walk the walk they talk. It is also highly readable, and though dealing with some relatively complex topics (especially in chapter six) it skilfully explains everything with minimal jargon, of both the theological & the socio-political kinds. I'd highly recommend this as a book to give to Christians who take following Jesus seriously but don't seem all that fussed about justice; it might serve to tip them over the fence.

the Corpus Hermeticum

This book is one I've read before and thus blogged about before, see prior post - although this text is very easily available for free online, I've not included links either there or here as maintaining an air of mystery seems key for me in these kinds of cryptic ancient documents. I can't really say I got much new out of it on a second reading - it still feels like wisdom farting in your face for fun. To discern anything meaningful from these writings would either take a lifetime of arcane study or an unthought-out kneejerk series of seemingly-brilliant hunches, neither of which I really have time for. As lurid and enjoyable as the Corpus Hermeticum is, I really don't think it has, or arguably has ever had, really that much to offer philosophy, science, or faith. So, yeh. Don't take my word for it - give it a google and read the .pdf of the thing. It will confuse you and illuminate you in equal measure, ultimately leading nowhere special.

Stories of God

This book by Rainer M. Rilke is a collection of thirteen inter-related short stories, framed through the device of an unnamed narrator telling these stories to various elderly or disabled friends. It was written in 1899 after Rilke visited rural Russia where he met many spiritually inspiring peasants - the text has probably been translated into English a few times, but I used the Shambhala 2003 version.

   Anyway. Whatever God these are stories of, it is not the Abrahamic one. Rilke's God is vaguely easy to like as a character but very hard to imagine one seriously worshipping as a deity. 'God' comes across as benevolent, yes - but also impotent, neurotic, infantile at times; the stories may have poignant poetic overtones but they are rather devoid of any meaningful insight into God's character as understood by orthodox tradition, or even mystics - it reads like the excited scribblings of someone who has found themselves suddenly entranced by mysticism & wants to dabble in it despite having minimal understanding of spiritual or theological frameworks underlying all said authentic mysticisms. Which, knowing Rilke's biography, is probably a fairly astute judgement.

   The human characters in these stories too are quite boringly sketched; they seem to have one personality between them and that largely a mere mechanism for delivering authorial ponderings (except in the last chapter, where they behave more like actual characters) . This collection of stories may be titillating to the heart & provocative to the mind but they have virtually nothing to offer the soul. Which I for one found disappointing for a book of such a title. Sharpish prose & dullish ideas; interesting & entertaining, but not particularly helpful for any real, deep explorations in faith. A few of them are fairly edifying, but chapter eleven, about the artists' association, is in my opinion the closest any of them come to making an original potent point.

   I would maybe recommend this if you'd be interested in well-written curious little folk fairy-tales with 'God' as the core character - but if you're looking for profound, challenging, spiritually-insightful fiction, this probably isn't it.