the Vision of God

This book (available from the Internet Archive from that link for free) by Nicholas of Cusa* is an underrated classic of Christian mysticism. It eschews the argumentative polemic format & instead takes on a kind of prolonged doxology - which fully befits its core theme, the infinity of God. The first half circles around the implications of the ideas that God is omniscient & omnipresent, everywhere & everywhen & thus all-seeing, all-knowing; the theological groundwork discussed here is drawn out in subjective implication for the believer in how they relate to [i.e. can see, can know] God as, being as they are, finite. The second half is dedicated to unpacking the depths of the Christian idea of God as Trinity, and how this relates to philosophical notions of infinitude; followed with unpacking the nest of complexities in how Jesus relates to God as infinite - a hefty task which in my opinion Nicholas undertakes well. While perhaps not as original in content as some of his other works (see the * below) as this is merely expanding on well-trodden ground within Christian thinking, this book still explores some very cogent angles about essentials of orthodox faith & does so in beautiful language; definitely worth a read for any Christian wanting to pick at the scab of ignorance that has formed over the cut in their spiritual skin made by cognizance that we, as finite human sinners, somehow have to relate to an infinite incomprehensible perfect Lord.

* Yeh, what with this after this and that I've been reading a lot of him recently. What can I say? Interesting thinker!

On Peaceful Unity of Faith

This book [available as a free .pdf online from that link] by Nicholas of Cusa is, as with his other work I recently discovered, remarkably ahead of its time for what it is - what it is being a holistic statement of Christocentric religious universalism. In a series of dialogues between the Word of God and Saints Peter & Paul on the explaining side & various representatives of the nations on the questioning side, we start by exploring the conceptual foundations of what we philosophically and/or religiously consider "wisdom" to be. Cusa defines it as divine oneness, which is the foundation for his next argument for the perfect simple unity of the Trinity, despite it seeming such a bizarre doctrine to people who have grown up in other faiths. Next the conversation turns to Christology, building on conceptions of divinity and common understandings of human nature to sketch a cosmic anatomy of the Son of God that, while far from intuitive, is straightforward enough to grasp, orthodox enough to grow into, and compelling to ponder.

   I won't lie, I was hoping for more interfaith dialogue from this book.* It's not a long read by any measure but I would have happily spent twice as long reading it should there have been considerations of the Indian & Chinese religions - but alas we are left with solely the Abrahamic trio. I suppose Germany in the mid-1400's is quite a way away from the heartlands of Hindu or Buddhist worshippers. Despite this quibble I found this a very engaging and readable text, and though it is nowhere near sufficient as a total apologetic of Christ over the limited fragments of truth contained [spermatikos logos innit] in other religious traditions it does still provide some very deft philosophical ripostes for the two biggest stumbling blocks in communicating intellectually the fabric of Christianity to those of the other Abrahamic faiths.

* Beyond mere apologetic dialogue I was half-expecting it to be in & of itself an attempt to sketch the metaphysical & theological outlines of all religions brought together in peaceful unity, á la Blake's All Religions Are One.

On Learned Ignorance

This book [available from that link as a .pdf online for free] is a text by 15th-century German Catholic cardinal & polymath Nicholas of Cusa, although to read it (apart from its obvious grounding in Christian orthodoxy) you could be pardoned for assuming it's a work of ancient Greek philosophy, so inchoate & fundamental does it seem in its scope & gist.

   Whereas other medieval mystical Christian texts concern themselves with the nature & practice of contemplation or the spiritual rigours of a life as a disciple, in this extremely concise & precise work Nicholas presents us with a solid axiomatic procedural argument for the fundamental incomprehensibility of God in his infinitude, yet given the nature of that infinitude he remains knowable, relatable to, enjoyable even, in his personal triune essence. The logic undergirding this position draws on mathematical geometric truth [similarly to Spinoza's method but superior, as it employs geometry as essential fact rather than merely the axiomatic method of logical procedure*], pure as it is, to fabricate images of infinity & possibility, thereby to provide handholds for the imagination in its fruitless attempts to imagine anything more transcendently perfectly plausibly than the Trinity itself in its divine community & personality.

   This is easily the most compelling argument for Christianity that I have ever read - an apologetic for our admittedly weird & paradoxical notions of God in his truest fullest being that proceeds not from eclectic esoterica or theological winds but from extremely basic self-evident truths about consciousness, cognizance, structured thought & imaginings & possibility, walking you straight up to the doors of perception of God then ringing the doorbell & running away, leaving you to stand empty-handed & dry-mouthed to explain yourself to the triune God whose ineffable presence has just been more or less proven yet about whom you realise you can say or know nothing suitable. God is bigger, God is more beautiful, God is far beyond - as much as right here. This text achieves what in my view is one of the most outlandish victories in the history of philosophy, and I am alarmed that old Nick isn't better-known (see - he doesn't even get a single mention in Russell's History); it's also extremely readable, far more so than the majority of philosophy or theology books that pop up on this blog. I would implore anyone to read it & take a serious hammer of intentionality to see whether there are any cracks in the edifice of this text's idea, because I can't discern any.

   I'll leave you with a copy-paste of the book's contents page, as the chapter titles alone give a clear idea of how the argument proceeds:

1. How it is that knowing is not-knowing.

2. Preliminary clarification of what will follow.

3. The precise truth is incomprehensible.

4. The Absolute Maximum (coinciding with the Minimum) is understood incomprehensibly.

5. The Maximum is one.

6. The Maximum is Absolute Necessity.

7. The trine and one Eternity.

8. Eternal generation.

9. The eternal procession of union.

10. An understanding of trinity in oneness transcends all things.

11. Mathematics assists us very greatly in apprehending various divine [truths].

12. The way in which mathematical signs ought to be used in our undertaking.

13. The characteristics of a maximum, infinite line.

14. An infinite line is a triangle.

15. The maximum triangle is a circle and a sphere.

16. In a symbolic way the Maximum is to all things as a maximum line is to [all] lines.

17. Very deep doctrines from the same [symbolism of an infinite line].

18. From the same [symbolism] we are led to an understanding of the participation in being.

19. The likening of an infinite triangle to maximum trinity.

20. Still more regarding the Trinity. There cannot be fourness, [fiveness], etc., in God.

21. The likening of an infinite circle to oneness.

22. How God's foresight unites contradictories.

23. The likening of an infinite sphere to the actual existence of God.

24. The name of God; affirmative theology.

25. The pagans named God in various ways in relation to created things.

26. Negative theology.

Ignorance of the learned type described herein is a powerful humbling tool in the quest to know God; here, with brute-force mathematical logical brushstrokes, Nicholas of Cusa makes it easy - we are able to shake the hand, in a tiny, silent, virtually meaningless yet utterly unignorable manner, of the triune God who defies knowledge.

* An infinite line is an infinite triangle. An infinite triangle is an infinite sphere. An infinite sphere is [though perfectly lacking] God.